Wednesday, August 26, 2009

環保觸覺--環保塔利班

睇完每日一膠金手指荒木茂個blog, 忍唔住要寫番篇blog.

環保觸覺經常不厭其煩的指責香港人用多咗條毛好唔環保, 呻咗兩行鼻涕又唔環保, 專向最雞毛蒜皮既小事著手, 然後就話要收錢, 結果就係將件事越搞越唔環保.

好似膠袋稅, 事前話抽左膠袋稅就掂, 但事實係抽稅後塑膠使用量反而上升5%, 用多咗膠, 更加唔環保.

破壞地球既環保觸覺成員, 又會唔會為咗保護環境, 食咗多出黎既膠呢?

當然唔會! 佢地淨係識得排放二氧化碳, 加劇全球暖化問題.

環保觸覺最唔環保既地方就係, 佢地次次都要開記者招侍會黎宣布佢地既絕世好橋. 點解一定要開記招? 點解唔識用Teleconference, 寫blog或者email ?


記招場地要冷氣、燈光, 浪費幾多電, 幾唔環保呀!

記者、攝製隊山長水遠坐車去記招, 消耗幾多油同電, 幾唔環保呀!

第日報紙報導你單"環保新聞", 用幾多紙呀, 幾唔環保呀!

粗略估計, 連免費報, 香港每日報紙印三百多萬份. 環保觸覺佔據報章的的一角, 會浪費熱帶雨林4.57棵大樹, 環保觸覺令全球暖化問題惡化。

環保觸覺專門破壞環境, 係氣候暖化既元兇, 唔知綠色和平幾時通緝"香港拉登"譚凱邦呢?



developing...

9 comments:

  1. let me attempt to response in the al gore way:

    -the excess carbon emissions created by the press-con can be offseted by buying carbon-offset credits.

    -carbon offset is done by planting more trees in developing countries, which compensates for the papers wasted from the press con.

    -"green" is all about making things efficient. so asking all the reporters to show up at the press con can increase their work load per month, resulting in higher efficiency since their salary is fixed.

    okay, i know it sounds BS. but this is what talking "green" is all about haha.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good answers. Hope they really do so.

    I feel that point 3 is kinda inconsistent with the first two. Using their argument, it is not about economically efficient, it's about environment!

    Well, Al gore may say:

    Therefore, reporters should buy cable-offset credits....bla bla bla

    ReplyDelete
  3. the idea of carbon offset itself is a joke. it's like telling people it's okay to kill others as much as they can, as long as they safe the same amount of people. gore himself made a fortune in this business, that's why he so such a "leader" haha...

    if i work in the cattle industry, i would encourage people to eat more beef since cow fart emission is far more serious that cars. if we can eat cows faster than they breed and grow, one day we can eliminate the axis of evil and live a green life haha.....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Those "greenists" are more materialistic than all of us. They just want money.

    If they think plastic is bad for the earth, they should advocate universal plastic ban, all kind of plastic. But they just want some pennies.

    Again, for the carbon offset stuff. Same logic. They love emission. That's the way they earn their livings.

    ReplyDelete
  5. they can't advocate universal plastic ban cuz they don't wanna ban themselves haha.....

    ReplyDelete
  6. 喂,你捨得update個blog未呀?

    ReplyDelete
  7. 得得得, 各位施主, 現已重新運作(我個腦)!

    ReplyDelete